Thursday, December 18, 2014

"If I Told You Once, I Told You a Thousand Times" - Turnitin Buys Automated Writing Feedback Company Lightside Labs


Sisyphus, detail of Tartarus [Tantalus],
Abraham Dircksz Santvoort, 1668
Etching.  Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
http://hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.collect.170486
Anyone who's had to grade student papers in any subject has had the experience, new each semester (or in the worst case, new each assignment) of repeating the same writing pointers and making the same corrections over and over.  It can make you feel like Sisyphus, the king of Greek mythology condemned to roll a boulder uphill over and over, forever.

Over (and over) the years I've tried various timesavers - group instruction given ahead of time, seeding writing pointers into the assignment instructions, videos, posting info on the web, going over paper drafts ex post facto with the whole class or individually.  I've constructed a word file of my greatest hits and checked the ones that applied to the paper at hand. I've sung, I've danced, I've threatened, I've assigned The Elements of Style, but the boulder keeps rolling back down.

The online grading and anti-plagiarism giant  Turnitin.com recognized the Sisyphean quality of grading papers when it introduced its Grademark tool, which provides a pre-loaded set of comments addressing the most common issues in student writing, and allowing instructors to add their own favorites.

But what about an ounce of prevention?  What if students could get feedback on that stuff and leave me free to edit for structure, concept, logic, flow, or, God help us, content?

Enter LightSide Labs, Turnitin.com's recent acquisition.  Lightside Labs' Revision Assistant, like other tools such as Pearson Writer, and Turnitin's own Writecheck for students, provides automated feedback on student writing.  According to Turnintin.com, the recently-founded (2013) Lightside bears an impressive pedigree.
"The company has been supported by grants and contracts from major organizations in education, like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. LightSide [is] based on machine learning and natural language processing research from Carnegie Mellon’s Language Technologies Institute."
 How good is it? Can it really work? According to Turnitin, "This feedback is trained on the behavior of real instructors and provides personalized, positive, and constructive support for student writers." Of course this begs several questions, one of which is, which instructors? What behavior?
More to come as I investigate over the next week or so....

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Learning to Learn, Learning to Trust


“Don’t be afraid to ask for help.” The trainee looks at me skeptically. He’s applying a CSS stylesheet to a five-page website, the penultimate assignment of his technology training.
“You can ask me, or someone else- there are lots of resources!” I say.

He’s bright. His work is good. But he’s frustrated, staring at the screen, clenching his fists. He’s building a tricky page, so I suggest we consult the web department about the best strategy for coding it. He rejects this. “I’ll figure it out.”

For days he refuses help, goes it alone. It seems simple enough – just ask! Yet he doesn’t. Finally, standing in the Hopeworks kitchen over a slice of fresh-baked bread, he confesses, “I don’t want them to think I can’t do it by myself.” He’s worried if he asks for help, he won’t be considered for an internship. He’s afraid of being seen as weak.

At Hopeworks, one of the most important skills Camden youth develop is “Learning To Learn.” That is, we believe any trainee can learn to learn and grow on their own. Hopeworks teaches and nurtures initiative, active ownership of learning, and resourcefulness. Part of this is knowing when to ask for help, and this is especially difficult for many of our youth.

Why is it so hard? We all know elderly folks who fall trying to do their own painting or cleaning, young people who refuse to ask for assistance until it’s too late. But a more revealing question is, “What happened?” If we stop asking “Why won’t you ask?” and instead ask “What happened to you that not asking for help makes sense?” we begin to see that for many people – the ones we label “stubborn,” “proud,” or even “fiercely independent” — there is a deeper, more troubling possibility: attachment avoidance.

Attachment avoidant individuals make up a fairly high percentage (approximately 30%) of people with intrafamilial violence or other serious trauma. They have experienced a deep, traumatic violation of trust or traumatic loss, often during childhood. Some of their defensive patterns include:

  • Relying on deactivation of attachment as strategy to cope with attachment-related distress
  • Shifting attention away from events or feelings that would trigger the attachment system or painful emotions and memories of attachment figures (such as childhood loss of a parent or sibling through death, divorce or incarceration)
  • Idealizing even undeserving parents or other caregivers as a way of preserving a positive perception of them
  • “Minimizing emotional meaning of traumatic events and their long-term implications” using a variety of strategies such as glossing over, claiming a happy ending (“I was OK in the end”), talking around the traumatic event, intellectualizing it (“It made me stronger”), or focusing on other important issues (such as an upcoming exam or conflict with a girlfriend) as a way of diverting attention from attachment-related issues and the unmanageable emotions that accompany them.
  • Being compulsively or insistently self-reliant, often stemming from a worldview that others are unreliable. Hyper-invested in presenting themselves as strong, independent, competent and normal, attachment avoidant individuals have great difficulty acknowledging the need for help and asking for help. (They can be like the trainee described above, who could not risk asking for help even in a learning environment where it was encouraged.)
  • Cutting off relationships temporarily or permanently as a way of managing difficult emotions and, paradoxically, preserving the relationship (We often see this several weeks into training when sometimes trainees disappear or show sporadic attendance after a strong start – “just as it is getting good.”)
(Based on Robert T. Muller, Trauma and the Avoidant Client)

In the training room some of the effects of trauma our youth endure as residents of a violent, impoverished city emerge as this reluctance to ask for assistance. So often they say, “I’ll do it on my own.” When I first came to Hopeworks it felt like rejection. Why wasn’t I connecting with them? Was I not accessible enough? Was I approaching them the wrong way?

But after I started to get a sense of their environment — the harsh street where any sign of weakness (particularly for young men) can mean violence or death; the poverty, multiple traumas, neglect, adverse childhood events, and losses so many Camden youth experience — I started to see that, for our youth, asking for help means taking a big risk. Asking for help can mean opening oneself to remembering a time when others would not or could not help, where one was left vulnerable by those who should have helped and protected. For many youth, asking for help can feel like exposing weakness. It can make them feel vulnerable. And yet, this vulnerable space is the space of opportunity and the opening for change and growth. At Hopeworks it is our job to make a space where youth can safely experience their own vulnerability as they take risks to learn.

Studying avoidant attachment in our staff study group has opened my eyes and led me to interpret youth’s rejection of help not as a reflection on my training style but rather as an aspect of the experience of living and working in Camden. I’m starting to understand what a risk it represents for so many of our youth to make the leap and ask for help. I’m seeing how essential it is to provide a place – and to build a community – where they can feel safe to do so. This means we must engage the emotions that are evoked when people engage in learning. These emotions can be powerful and can make learning, and the change that comes from it, feel unsafe. So in a real way, for Hopeworks youth, learning to learn means learning to trust.

How does it make you feel to ask for help?

This post was originally published in the Hopeworks 'n Camden blogHopeworks is a youth development organization that uses technology training and employment opportunities to partner with young men and women to achieve their dreams. 



Monday, November 11, 2013

Who's Got Your Back?

"It's not a question of whether your hard drive will crash, it's a question of when."  Bright faces look up at me from the classroom seats.  Some nods.  Some open mouths. They're paying attention.  "So if you haven't backed up your work, and it makes you hand in your paper late, too bad. Don't write at the last minute.  You're responsible to allow yourself enough time to deal with the computer problems that inevitably will happen to some of you this semester."  I've imparted maybe the most important thing I will ever teach in a classroom: BACK UP YOUR WORK! Yes: I am a backtivist.

I've been a big proponent (read: nag) of backing up. I preach the backup gospel to my students at the start of every semester, and before every deadline.  I always back up everything.  Important files I'm working on go to the cloud, and I use a couple of different services such as Dropbox and SugarSync.  Still haven't jumped on the iCloud bandwagon yet, but that's in the works.

I also use Apple's application, Time Machine, which saves multiple versions of your files.  I send my backups wirelessly to Apple's Time Capsule, the magical white box that may save my behind one day.  Or will it?

My dirty little secret is I'm not really sure how it works or what it's backing up, and I haven't troubled myself to find out.  The burningest question is, does it back up the files of the other users on my computer?  Apple compartmentalizes, so that I don't have to see my husband's stuff on my desktop or listen to his iTunes, and he doesn't have to see mine.  But is his stuff going to the capsule?  What about my laptop? Can I send that to the Time Capsule too? 

And what about how this all works with the laptop? I've mostly been backing up individual files, keeping only what I'm actually working on on the laptop and backing it up to DropBox.  Then when the project is complete I transfer it to my desktop machine, where, presumably, Time Machine automatically sends a backup to the Time Capsule. 

I've finally decided to get serious about it and found a  basic article from Smith College outlining the pros and cons of various backup methods in clear language.  Next column - let's see what I find out.

Friday, September 27, 2013

Collaborating in the Cloud: Flat PaikBot and Teaching

PaikBot at a stockton tricking session by @Gronnana
This striking image was created by my student, photographer Glenn Armstrong,  as part of an optional assignment in Art History: Renaissance to the Present, a survey course I taught at the Richard Stockton College of New Jersey in fall 2012.  The assignment asked students to contribute to the Smithsonian American Art Museum's online project, Paikbot Travels, in connection with Nam June Paik: Global Visionary, its 2013 retrospective of the work of Paik, a pioneering video artist.

My goals were to urge the students to explore the web resources typical of a large national museum, and to gain an understanding of some of the ways art and art worlds are changing in the digital age.  To counteract the tendency of large lecture courses to create passive recipients, I designed the assignment to urge students to participate in art worlds - and to be a part of American art history -  by creating and contributing.  We had research projects and presentations, but I wanted them to experience new media as well.

To see more of these images, check out the Smithsonian American Art Museum's Pinterest board for Paiklandia: Paikbot Travels.  The project drew participants from all over the globe.  So proud of Glenn's arresting contribution!

Thursday, June 20, 2013

The Great Wiknik Wikipedia Picnic is coming to Penn Park!



Wikipedia Wiknik Meetup

Every year thousands of contributors to Wikipedia meet all over the world to celebrate.  This year Philadelphia will host one such gathering on June 22:  The Wiknik, a huge picnic in Penn Park allows people who use, contribute to, or otherwise love Wikipedia to meet up, have fun, and share a picnic.  Head out there and bring your lunch, sunscreen, blanket, a Frisbee, and sense of camaraderie!

Friday, April 5, 2013

Another Great Library Goes Online: Netherlands



Research mavens rejoice! Publishing Perspectives reports that yet another of the world's great libraries has made its collection accessible online.  Read this Publishing Perspectives article to learn how the National Library of the Netherlands has made 80,000 titles available, some from the 18th century.  Another 80,000 are in the pipeline to be digitized and made accessible in the near future.  Before you start whining that you don't read Dutch, some of them are bound to be in Latin, if that helps.  The illustrations alone are worth a peek.

I don't read Dutch, either, but as the inimitable Renata Holod taught me as an undergrad, "Don't let the fact that you don't know a language stop you from using a book."   She said, "Get a dictionary.  If it's in Russian, you can learn the Cyrillic alphabet."  I took that advice to heart and I've never looked back.  Now we have online sites like Google Translate to help us get the gist of what we read, although I still recommend breaking out a really good dictionary - and your judgment -  if you really want an accurate understanding. 

But to get a taste of the riches in store for all of us, click this link to see what I found when I typed "English" into the National Library's searchbar on its http://boeken1.kb.nl/  page

So, teachers: Age of Discovery or World History projects? Botany projects?  Geography, anybody?  The resources available to our students boggle the mind. And almost none of it was online even 20 years ago.  Happy hunting!

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Getting rich off of schoolchildren


If you follow educational technology, by now you will have noticed the competition for school technology dollars heating up.  In Getting rich off of schoolchildren, Salon's David Sirota asks if some big-bucks reform advocates aren't really wolves in sheep's clothing.  

He blasts what he calls the pervasive media myth of "Greedy Teachers vs. Altruistic Billionaire" and questions the motivations of the bumper crop of super-rich technology satraps swooping in to "save" education from venal, moneygrubbing teachers:
The first reason to scoff at this mythology should be obvious: It simply strains credulity to insist that pedagogues who get paid middling wages but nonetheless devote their lives to educating kids care less about those kids than do the Wall Street hedge funders and billionaire CEOs who finance the so-called reform movement. Indeed, to state that pervasive assumption out loud is to reveal how utterly idiotic it really is, and yet it is baked into almost all of today’s coverage of education politics.
If there wasn't huge profit, it why all this interest?  Sirota continues:

This is why the tech site Geekwire predicts another full-scale tech industry bubble, thanks to “K-12 and other education segments now being chased by a mob of investment capitalists.”
I can't help noticing that a lot of the free webinars and other teacher-ed and pedagogical help I'm offered online is really shilling a particular product.  Of course advertisers have the right to market their products.  But when does it cross the line into distorting educational policy?

What do you think?